Haney’s Court

Human VS Computer Led Classroom – Haney

Human_Computer Led School from Jordan Haney on Vimeo.

Human VS Computer Led Classroom – Cain

Human_Computer Led School from Jordan Haney on Vimeo.

Uniforms in School – Cain

Uniforms in Schools from Jordan Haney on Vimeo.

Uniforms in School – Haney

Uniforms in School from Jordan Haney on Vimeo.

Traditional VS Year-Round School – Cain

Traditional vs Year-Round Calendar 1 from Jordan Haney on Vimeo.

Traditional VS Year-Round School – Haney

Traditional vs Year-Round Calendar from Jordan Haney on Vimeo.

Phones in School – Cain

Phones in Schools from Jordan Haney on Vimeo.

Phones in School – Haney

Phones In School from Jordan Haney on Vimeo.

Homework in School – Cain

Homework in Schools from Jordan Haney on Vimeo.

Homework in School – Haney

Homework In School from Jordan Haney on Vimeo.

Government VS Student Choice Lunch

Government vs Student Choice Lunch from Jordan Haney on

Week 25

I had an awesome 25th week of school. First, We had a little FUNd raiser (get it? fun, raiser) called Dads & Donuts where you bring your dad for donuts. Next, We went to see a Steel Drum Band in our gym, they played  Caribbean themed songs. Then, a few weeks ago Mr. Haney filled in a grant to win $3,000 to buy new laptops & microphones, we won. So the lady who gave us the money cam in our class for a little talk about the things we might use the new stuff for, and Bill Gates (the founder of Microsoft) will listen to the song that I posted several weeks ago. Lastly, a student in my class named Arriana got Ram Of The Week which is where your teacher nominates a student. That is what I did on my 25th week of school.File Feb 26, 8 44 46 AM

Pollution and Littering. By: Eric Lindley

Have you ever littered or thrown trash on the ground? The articles “Drinking Water: Bottled or from the Tap?” by Catherine Clarke Fox and “Art for Ocean Animals,” by Elise Jonas-Delson have numerous similarities and differences. They both discuss pollution and littering, but in different ways. In my essay, I will compare and contrast “Drinking Water: Bottled or from the Tap?” by Catherine Clarke Fox and “Art for Ocean Animals,” by Elise Jonas-Delson. Let’s discuss about their numerous similarities.

“Drinking Water: Bottled or from the Tap?” by Catherine Clarke Foxand “Art for Ocean Animals,” by Elise Jonas-Delsonhave numerous similarities, for example, They are both about litter/littering because they talk about the harm they can do the environment. Another similarity is they are both about some body or state of water, in “Drinking Water: Bottled or from the Tap?” by Catherine Clarke Fox,  it is from the tap or water bottles. In “Art for Ocean Animals,” by Elise Jonas-Delson, it talks from the ocean and marine life.  Also, these two articles are written in 3rd person, using words like: Her, she, he, it, and etc. The final reason is they both talk about reusable items, in “Drinking Water: Bottled or from the Tap?” by Catherine Clarke Fox it states “Plastic bottles can be turned into items like carpeting or cozy fleece clothing.” That means if you have carpets in your house, it’s most likely made of plastic. In “Art for Ocean Animals,” by Elise Jonas-Delson it talks about turing pollution into sculptures, in the text it says “One of Angela’s sculptures is a turtle. The turtle’s head is an old garbage can lid.” and the text also states “Another sculpture, called Fish Bite Fish, is shaped like a fish and made out of little bits of plastic that contain tooth and claw marks from the fish and crabs that tried to devour the plastic.” and the last detail the text states is “The Sea Star figure is made of glass and plastic bottles.” Those were the similarities that “Drinking Water: Bottled or from the Tap?” by Catherine Clarke Foxand “Art for Ocean Animals,” by Elise Jonas-Delson had in common. Let’s discuss the differences between the two passages.

“Drinking Water: Bottled or from the Tap?” by Catherine Clarke Foxand “Art for Ocean Animals,” by Elise Jonas-Delson also differ from each other in many ways. In “Art for Ocean Animals,” by Elise Jonas-Delson the setting is in Oregon because in the text it states “Pozzi started Washed Ashore when she noticed plastics on the beaches in Oregon,” so that made me think she was in Oregon. However in “Drinking Water: Bottled or from the Tap?” by Catherine Clarke Fox it states “In order to make all these bottles, manufacturers use 17 million barrels of crude oil.” So, that means the people work in factories all over the world.  Even though the passages are both about water, in “Drinking Water: Bottled or from the Tap?” by Catherine Clarke Fox the water either comes from bottled or tap water. On the other hand in “Art for Ocean Animals,” by Elise Jonas-Delson the water comes from the ocean. In “Drinking Water: Bottled or from the Tap?” it states “Water is good for you, so keep drinking it. But think about how often you use water bottles, and see if you can make a change.” so that means don’t drink too much water from bottles, consider drinking a cup from the tap. In “Art for Ocean Animals,” by Elise Jonas-Delson it states “Artist Angela Haseltine Pozzi doesn’t throw it away. She uses the trash to create giant sculptures of marine animals.” That means Angela Pozzi (also know as Pozzi) makes sculptures. Those two statements from the texts state very different subjects. “Drinking Water: Bottled or from the Tap?” by Catherine Clarke Foxand “Art for Ocean Animals,” have numerous similarities and differences.

In conclusion, these two passages have details that they have in common, and details they don’t, but that doesn’t change the fact that they both talk about pollution and the harms it can cause to Earth. We can all make a change if we stop littering and save our entire environment. If we all stop littering, we can have life again, and bring back the trees, plants, animals, and sky. You can make pollution into cool decorative objects, like sculptures, rugs, and clothing. Make the world a better place, by recycling objects that are recyclable like milk jugs, water bottles, and paper. And stop littering. If I stop littering, I would be so happy to see all the beautiful trees, plants, animals, and sky. So please, stop littering, and save the earth.

Rescue Dogs By:Eric Lindley

Have you ever met a rescue dog? The articles “It’s a Dog’s Life” by Rebecca Upjohn Snyder and “Hide-and-Seek-School” by Vivienne Lenk have some similarities and differences. They both talk about rescue dogs and what they do but, “Hide-and-Seek-School” by Vivienne Lenk is about avalanche rescue dog, while “It’s a Dog’s Life” by Rebecca Upjohn Snyder is about a herding rescue dog. In my essay I will compare and contrast these two articles. First, let’s discuss the similarities.

“It’s a Dog’s Life” by Rebecca Upjohn Snyder and “Hide-and-Seek-School” by Vivienne Lenk have many similarities, for example, Jack the Border Collie and Rube, Ruby, Roux, and Kodi are all dogs. Also they all work very hard by finding victims in an avalanche and herding sheep, ducks, goats, pigs, and other farm animals into the pens. They all also have strong instincts because they want to work instead of play. The last similarity is they are both are very loyal to their owners by showing love and affection. Those were the similarities of “Hide-and-Seek-School” by Vivienne Lenk and “It’s a Dog’s Life” by Rebecca Upjohn Snyder, let’s discuss the differences.

“Hide-and-Seek-School” by Vivienne Lenk and It’s a Dog’s Life” by Rebecca Upjohn Snyder have many differences. In the passage “It’s a Dog’s Life” by Rebecca Upjohn Snyder the story is about dogs rescuing victims in an avalanche, on the other hand, the passage “Hide-and-Seek-School” by Vivienne Lenk is about Border Collies herding animals into the pens. In “Hide-and-Seek-School” by Vivienne Lenk Rube, Ruby, Roux, and Kodi’s owners are named Kristin and  Aaron, however in “It’s a Dog’s Life” by Rebecca Upjohn Snyder  Jack’s owners name is David. In “Hide-and-Seek-School” by Vivienne Lenk the dogs get to ride chairlifts and snowmobiles and get a break every summer, on the other hand, in “It’s a Dog’s Life” by Rebecca Upjohn Snyder the dog doesn’t get a break, instead he has to work. Those were the similarities and differences of  the articles “It’s a Dog’s Life” by Rebecca Upjohn Snyder and “Hide-and-Seek-School” by Vivienne Lenk.

In conclusion, rescue dogs are important. They are important you and me in the same way. They help people with cancer and disabilities like blindness, deaf (can’t hear) , and loneliness. They rescue people from avalanches, mud slides, and possibly even death. They also can herd sheep and other farm animals into pens. Even though they might work a lot doesn’t mean they don’t like to play. They rescue a lot of people on a daily basis. Us without rescue dogs is like the world without the moon/sun, incomplete

Why I am For Pluto being a Planet. By: Eric Lindley

In two recent articles “What is a Planet?” by NASA and “When is a Planet not a Planet?” by Daniel Santos, they both proclaim that the IAU reclassified Pluto as a “dwarf planet”. There is much controversy going on about if Pluto should be a planet or not. I strongly believe that the IAU’s decision to reclassify Pluto as a “dwarf planet” was wrong. The reasons I think that are because the third criteria/definition for a planet is very vague and unclear. Also textbook creators don’t want to change the textbooks and museums, and experts want Pluto to be a planet for historical reasons, since Pluto has been a planet for more than 70 years.

One reason is the third criteria of a planet is it must have a cleared orbital neighborhood (that means it must have all objects around it be out of the way) but what does that mean.  Experts state that the definition is “Awful” and “Sloppy science” and they say the definition is too vague. Also the criteria doesn’t’ state how much it has to clear. However, there is one more reason.

The other reason is textbook creators and museums don’t want to change the textbooks for Pluto being a “dwarf planet” since the books say it’s still a planet.  Could you imagine how much money that would take to make over one million textbooks and museums. That’s about over one billion dollars. However, there is still one more reason.

The last reason is experts want Pluto to be a planet for historical reasons. Pluto has been a planet for more than 70 years, so why do we change it now? Some supporters say “Leave Pluto alone! ” Even some angry schoolchildren wrote the IAU demanding that Pluto should stay a planet. Those are my three reasons Pluto should be a planet.

That is why I strongly believe that the IAU’s decision to reclassify Pluto as a “dwarf planet” was wrong. What do you think, do you think the decision to reclassify Pluto was wrong or right? Those are my reasons why I strongly believe the IAU’s decision to reclassify Pluto was wrong.

Week 22

I had an awesome 22nd week of school. First, I typed up 3 4/5 paragraph essay’s… In 1 week! Next, I had my 1st full week of new, because last week I got trained. Then, we played a game (my favorite sport) GaGa Ball (a/k/a Octoball) it is really fun. Last, in math we are learning about volume (the algorithm is Length times width times hight.) That was what I did on the 22nd week of school.IMG_5546